Legal and Regulatory

Surviving the Construction Law Backlog: Nontraditional Approaches to Resolution
Options for resolving construction disputes will vary due to uncertainty caused by the pandemic, including how it impacts options for litigation, delays and cost due to courts’ limited operations.
By Jeffrey Kozek
May 21, 2021
Topics
Legal and Regulatory
by Jeffrey Kozek
Jeff Kozek is a licensed attorney in NJ and PA and a member of the New Jersey Bar Association’s Construction Law Section, as well as a member of the American Bar Association’s Public Contract Law Section and Forum Committee on the Construction Industry. Mr. Kozek, a Certified Forensic Claims Consultant and author of many articles on topics involving construction dispute resolution, has performed project management support services and construction claims analysis for over 40 years, often serving as an expert witness. He has lectured both domestically and abroad, to professional organizations, companies and groups, and to the general public on the topics of project delivery systems, equitable adjustments, construction claims avoidance and dispute resolution, critical path method scheduling, delay and disruption analysis and damages.
Top reads today
Related stories
Legal and Regulatory

ABC Applauds Trump Administration Action to Overhaul NEPA
By ABC
A Council on Environmental Quality interim rule was enacted to repeal all previous NEPA regulations.
Legal and Regulatory

GSA Ends Union-Only Contracting Schemes on Land Port of Entry Construction
By ABC
ABC applauds the decision by the GSA, which follows a court ruling against the Biden administration PLA policy.
Legal and Regulatory

Department of Defense Eliminates Biden’s Controversial Project Labor Agreement Mandate Policy
By ABC
After the Biden Administration's PLA mandate was rolled back, the DoD follows suit.