Legal and Regulatory
Termination for Convenience
Termination for convenience is almost never given to the downstream party, and it's found in private contracts.
By Chadd Reynolds
September 20, 2022
Topics
Legal and Regulatory
by Chadd Reynolds
Chadd Reynolds is a member of the firm's construction law, commercial and civil litigation practice groups where he represents individual owners and corporations in a variety of complex business and construction disputes in federal and state court, arbitration, and mediation. Reynolds can be reached at (404) 658-5454 or chadd.reynolds@chamberlainlaw.com.
Related stories
Legal and Regulatory
ABC Urges Senate to Pass a Clean CR to End Shutdown
By ABC
As the government remains shut down, ABC calls on the Senate to pass a continuing resolution.
Legal and Regulatory
ABC Opposes the Egregious Faster Labor Contracts Act
By ABC
The FLCA would stifle—if not effectively eliminate—construction companies' abilities to negotiate workplace conditions.
Legal and Regulatory
Supreme Court's Course Correction on NEPA Already Steering Decisions in Infrastructure Development Cases
By David Ayliffe
How a Colorado court case could set a precedent for minimizing legal infrastructure hurdles.