Allocating Responsibility and Damage Costs in Multi-Party Construction Disputes

In construction defect disputes, there is little consensus on how to allocate responsibility and costs to implicated parties.

Construction defect disputes are often complex matters. The evaluation of repair costs and the proper allocation to responsible parties is an important process that often needs to be addressed as part of the dispute resolution. To date, there is little to no consensus for the method of allocating responsibility and costs to implicated parties.

Here’s a standard method developed by a consulting group to allocate repair costs to implicated parties.

Identify the defect issues

The first step in the allocation process is to identify the defective conditions that are the basis of the claim. This process should follow well-established standards to investigate and develop forensic evidence supporting the allegations being raised. The result must include a well-organized listing of deficiencies that will provide a basis to subdivide the claim.

Identify the responsible parties

Responsible parties are identified by review of the project records including subcontractor agreements or other supporting documentation that link a party to defective work. Responsible parties are assigned a percentage of responsibility for each deficiency based upon their contractual responsibility as well as the effect their work had on the defective condition.

Calculate the cost of repair

The cost of repair may be derived from actual costs incurred or from a cost estimate of work yet to be performed. The total project cost must be assigned to all defects.

A complex claim may have multiple cost categories. While some items of cost can be assigned entirely to one defect, other costs may require further breakdown by the assessor. An example of a complex breakdown of costs is the replacement of a wall system due to multiple defective conditions. In this case, costs are divided among defect categories by considering the portion or area of the overall system impacted by the defect.

Other costs such as project overhead or special equipment can be allocated based upon the defect’s percentage of the overall cost or percentage of a subset of costs that share an item.

Allocate the repair costs to the responsible parties

A party’s allocation of the total project cost can be calculated by multiplying the cost per defect by each party’s percentage of responsibility for a given defect category.

While there could be other valid methods to allocate responsibility and damages, the scientific methods summarized in this article are a reasonable and equitable approach. Any application of this, or any other, allocation method should be used in conjunction with sound professional judgement.

This article represents an overview of KKCG’s analyses and methodologies in allocating repair cost to responsible parties.

Authors

  • Gary L Keene

    Construction industry insiders have known Gary as the man behind Keene Construction Company. The original company was founded in 1979, in Atlanta, Ga. He expanded the business to Florida a few years later, taking the role of CEO until 2005 when he sold his interest in Keene Construction Company. Gary is now a Managing Principal of Keene Klimas Consultant Group. He is a graduate of the University of Florida and is a Certified General Contractor Class “A.”

    View all posts
    Keene Klimas Consultant Group, LLC
    Principal
    http://www.keeneklimas.com/ |
  • Michael S Klimas

    Michael  "Max“ Klimas‘ extensive construction management experience includes serving in an executive role as VP of Operations for Keene Construction Company, operating his own consulting firms and achieving leadership positions at a number of construction companies in Florida. Max now maintains the position as a Managing Principal of Keene Klimas Consultant Group. Max is also a graduate of the University of Florida, Certified General Contractor Class “A”, LEED AP, and a State of Florida certified SWPPP inspector.

    View all posts
    Keene Klimas Consultant Group, LLC
    Managing Principal
    http://www.keeneklimas.com/ |
  • John C Jahreis

    John Jahreis has extensive experience in construction estimating, scheduling and construction management. He brings a practical approach to the analysis of complex construction cost, delay and defect related claims. John has experience with a variety of construction litigation analysis and has offered deposition and trial testimony. He has worked closely with Max and Gary for almost 10 years and is a graduate of the University of Florida, Certified General Contractor and LEED AP.

    View all posts
    Keene Klimas Consultant Group, LLC
    Associate - LEED AP
    http://www.keeneklimas.com/ |