Legal and Regulatory
Benefits (and Detriments) of Construction Arbitration
Most construction contracts include an alternative dispute resolution clause that requires parties to resolve all disputes by arbitration instead of going to court. What does it mean and is it a good thing?
By J. Gregory Cahill
July 13, 2018
Topics
Legal and Regulatory
by J. Gregory Cahill
J. Gregory Cahill’s practice focuses primarily on complex construction litigation and support for residential and commercial developers and contractors. Mr. Cahill also practices in the areas of insurance litigation and coverage and commercial litigation. He represents builders and developers throughout Arizona, New Mexico and California, including in State and Federal Court and in front of various administrative tribunals and regulatory bodies. He previously practiced in the areas of personal injury and uninsured/underinsured motorist litigation.
Related stories
Legal and Regulatory
ABC Opposes the Egregious Faster Labor Contracts Act
By ABC
The FLCA would stifle—if not effectively eliminate—construction companies' abilities to negotiate workplace conditions.
Legal and Regulatory
Supreme Court's Course Correction on NEPA Already Steering Decisions in Infrastructure Development Cases
By David Ayliffe
How a Colorado court case could set a precedent for minimizing legal infrastructure hurdles.
Legal and Regulatory
Navigating Disruption to Construction Projects Flowing From the America First Trade Policy
By Meagan T. Bachman
Months later, how is Trump's America First Trade Policy affecting the construction industry? Many companies still aren't quite sure.