Legal and Regulatory
Benefits (and Detriments) of Construction Arbitration
Most construction contracts include an alternative dispute resolution clause that requires parties to resolve all disputes by arbitration instead of going to court. What does it mean and is it a good thing?
By J. Gregory Cahill
July 13, 2018
Topics
Legal and Regulatory
by J. Gregory Cahill
J. Gregory Cahill’s practice focuses primarily on complex construction litigation and support for residential and commercial developers and contractors. Mr. Cahill also practices in the areas of insurance litigation and coverage and commercial litigation. He represents builders and developers throughout Arizona, New Mexico and California, including in State and Federal Court and in front of various administrative tribunals and regulatory bodies. He previously practiced in the areas of personal injury and uninsured/underinsured motorist litigation.
Related stories
Legal and Regulatory
The Role of AI and Human Lawyers in Construction Dispute Management
By Megan T. Bachman
Artificial intelligence is increasingly aiding in construction law practices, but it is still no replacement for a good attorney.
Legal and Regulatory
ABC Applauds Trump Administration Action to Overhaul NEPA
By ABC
A Council on Environmental Quality interim rule was enacted to repeal all previous NEPA regulations.
Legal and Regulatory
GSA Ends Union-Only Contracting Schemes on Land Port of Entry Construction
By ABC
ABC applauds the decision by the GSA, which follows a court ruling against the Biden administration PLA policy.